Start the conversation


We’re trial lawyers. Our core competency – above everything else – is trying cases to juries. And we specialize in beating giants.


Trial lawyers think about cases in a fundamentally different way than litigators.  Trial lawyers plan on every case going to trial and prepare accordingly.  We start cases by thinking about our closing argument at trial – the last words that we want the jury to hear.  And we work backwards from there – figuring out what evidence we’ll need in order to make that closing argument and, in turn, what discovery strategy we’ll need in order to have that evidence at trial.  Trial lawyers understand that defendants will not pay top dollar to settle cases until and unless we convince them – beyond any doubt – that we’re going to beat them at trial.

Litigators think about cases in chronological order – they start with initial pleadings, then move to discovery, then motions, and then, finally, they start to think about trial.  That’s way too late.  You’ve already lost if the first time your lawyers think about trial is right before trial.  Here’s an article that elaborates on the difference between trial lawyers and litigators.

By our results, philosophy, and training.  And because we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is, and get paid on success – not hourly arrangements like most firms.

We’re creative and we love making arrangements that tie our pay to success.  If you want a straight hourly agreement, we can do it.  But we prefer contingency or blended fee (either flat fee and contingency or hourly and contingency) agreements.